The athlete has played for some of the most prolific soccer clubs around.
In a TV interview with Sky One, Loos spoke of her supposed connection with the footballer.
“I think the chemistry between David and I was so strong .
people were aware and they weren’t very happy,” she said (viaNZ Herald).
The Beckhams eventually dropped the libel case, reaching a settlement with the tabloid in 2006.
There will be no further comment," (perThe Guardian).
They allegedly hooked up later on in London.
Nici claims that during their night of passion, Beckham was nothing but a perfect gentleman.
“He was very gentle and kind,” said the then 26-year-old, according to HuffPost.
Nici also remembered how thrilling the experience was.
“It was a high,” she said.
“All of these women dream of being with him, and I got to hook up with him.
It was very exciting.”
Beckham, however, had a very different view of the situation.
“I recall that the therapist did not leave my hotel room until the very early morning.
My security team was with me before, during and after the massage.
After the therapist left, I went to sleep.”
What legal action did Beckham take against In Touch?
Shortly after the story was released, Beckham took legal action a few months later.
The father of four sued the two parties, claiming his innocence.
Additionally, as a public figure, the private life of Beckham was one of interest to the public.
Beckham appealed, but the case was eventually thrown out again.
“They can’t just do this.
They can’t do this to us,” said Da Mata (viaDigital Spy).
Beckham fought back, charging against the claims in court.
According to his legal team, Da Mata’s injuries were sustained due to his own actions.
“The allegations against Mr. Beckham are false and are without merit.
The case was later dismissed.
During a London drive in 2019, Beckham was caught using his phone behind the wheel.
According to U.K. law, drivers cannot operate a mobile gear behind the wheel of a moving vehicle.
As a result, Beckham was fined 750 and had to pay an additional 100 in prosecution costs.
