Princess Diana may have had her fairytale wedding, but she never quite got her happily ever after.
The princess famously wed then-Prince Charles in a lavish 1981 wedding ceremony watched by millions all over the world.
However, the couple’s marriage started to unravel almost soon after they said their vows.
Nevertheless, the royal family allowed her to remain Diana, Princess of Wales.
Diana would’ve lost this title too, however, if she had gone on to remarry.
Nonetheless, their relationship became serious rather quickly.
Paul Burrell made similar claims when interviewed onABC News' “Good Morning America.
Burrell revealed thatDiana very much had her two sons in mindwhen looking at houses.
In addition, she got to keep all the jewelry she acquired throughout the marriage.
Buckingham Palace also allowed the princess to keep her Kensington Palace apartment so long as the queen agreed.
In addition, Diana also continued to have access to the royal family’s jets.
She could also continue to host gatherings at St. James’s Palace with Buckingham Palace’s permission.
“All the details on these matters, including titles, remain to be discussed and settled.
This will take time,” aspokesperson initially revealed.
That said, the two princes were mostly away at boarding school at that time.
That meant that the divorce wouldn’t have significantly affected how much time they spent with each parent.
The New York Times revealed that Charles and Diana agreed to alternate holidays.
After all, Princess Diana once said, “I live for my sons.
I would be lost without them.”
She would have also found other causes to promote and support.
“But I would like to redo some things,” she told Wyatt.
Away from prying eyes, Diana and Charles reportedly started to see each other more often.
“He kept popping over for cups of tea or to use the toilet.
Any excuse,” Simmons recalled.
When they got together, the exes enjoyed discussing their common interests such as organic farming and alternative medicine.
