Here’s everything we know about his fight.
What has Harry said about the royal rota in the past?
Before we dive into what Prince Harry said about this litigation, context is key.
“There’s a hierarchy of the family.
You know, there’s leaking, but there’s also planting of stories,” Harry said on-camera.
Meghan added, “The truth didn’t matter, the clickbait did.”
There is obviously concern that issues dealing with the royal family’s relationship with the press will be raised.
Harry has claimed there is collusion between them."
How did Mirror Group respond to Harry’s initial allegations?
As part of Prince Harry’s case, the aforementioned 33 stories were central to his argument.
“And litigation is so lengthy, stressful, and unpredictable, not to mention expensive.”
Yet another palace source put it in even blunter terms.
(viaNBC News).
Prince Harry continues to both complain and wants everyone else to explain.
This is a lose-lose situation for him.
Barristers in England are the equivalent of litigation attorneys in America.
They are trained in cross-examination and brilliant interrogation tactics."
“Harry’s decision to take the stand is brave that cannot be denied.
But is it wise?”
“The royal family has always played the long game when it comes to the press.
The monarchy is a brand and needs to maintain a working relationship with Britain’s tabloids.
If Harry prevails in this case, it will be a Pyrrhic victory at best.
I’m not sure what to say about that” (viaCNN).
Do people care that Harry is going against the royal rota?
This begs the question does Prince Harry’s new homeland care about his ongoing battle with the royal rota?
As far as exposure was concerned, Harry doesn’t have to worry there.
Here comes whether or not people actually care about the outcome, however.
“Is Harry still obsessed with former love Chelsy Davy?
Harry mentions her 118 times in court evidence, Meghan just five times.
No wonder Meg’s [sic] didn’t show up!”
Charles replied, “Pathetic, @amandajplatell you have no shame, and even less credibility.
Now you’re put up (by them?)
to misrepresent significant legal evidence as if it was something trivial.”
Hope that helps."
He was later found not guilty (perThe Guardian).
When will the case reach a verdict?
The short answer is not anytime soon.
